<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Climate opinion after UEA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/climate-opinion-after-uea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/climate-opinion-after-uea/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=climate-opinion-after-uea</link>
	<description>Interesting things about public opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 20:24:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Samosa &#187; Archive &#187; Sorry deniers – worries of global warming are up again</title>
		<link>http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/climate-opinion-after-uea/#comment-2607</link>
		<dc:creator>The Samosa &#187; Archive &#187; Sorry deniers – worries of global warming are up again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 11:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatesock.com/?p=95#comment-2607</guid>
		<description>[...] Dec ’09 was after ‘Climategate’ broke, it was before public opinion changed, so this is a good ‘before’ and ‘after’ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dec ’09 was after ‘Climategate’ broke, it was before public opinion changed, so this is a good ‘before’ and ‘after’ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sorry deniers &#8211; worries of global warming are up again &#124; Liberal Conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/climate-opinion-after-uea/#comment-2601</link>
		<dc:creator>Sorry deniers &#8211; worries of global warming are up again &#124; Liberal Conspiracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2012 21:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatesock.com/?p=95#comment-2601</guid>
		<description>[...] Dec ’09 was after ‘Climategate’ broke, it was before public opinion changed, so this is a good ‘before’ and ‘after’ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dec ’09 was after ‘Climategate’ broke, it was before public opinion changed, so this is a good ‘before’ and ‘after’ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Climate Sock &#187; Blog Archive &#187; There may be trouble ahead -</title>
		<link>http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/climate-opinion-after-uea/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Climate Sock &#187; Blog Archive &#187; There may be trouble ahead -</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 18:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatesock.com/?p=95#comment-19</guid>
		<description>[...] strong. A poll in December ’09, when the stories about UEA emails were at their peak, showed no significant movement in agreement with climate science. Yet, another poll, in January ’10, when the UEA stories had died down, but the cold weather was [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] strong. A poll in December ’09, when the stories about UEA emails were at their peak, showed no significant movement in agreement with climate science. Yet, another poll, in January ’10, when the UEA stories had died down, but the cold weather was [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Climate Sock &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Making the case for tackling climate change -</title>
		<link>http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/climate-opinion-after-uea/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Climate Sock &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Making the case for tackling climate change -</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 16:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatesock.com/?p=95#comment-18</guid>
		<description>[...] about the IPCC and UEA. The polls around the time of the coverage of the UEA email hack suggested little change in public opinion; it wasn’t until the freezing winter that the numbers really moved (though: post hoc ergo propter [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about the IPCC and UEA. The polls around the time of the coverage of the UEA email hack suggested little change in public opinion; it wasn’t until the freezing winter that the numbers really moved (though: post hoc ergo propter [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Climate Sock &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dancing to the wrong tune -</title>
		<link>http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/climate-opinion-after-uea/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Climate Sock &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dancing to the wrong tune -</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 22:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatesock.com/?p=95#comment-17</guid>
		<description>[...] the best way to measure changes over time; we should be more confident about this comparison than the comparison we saw last month, which suggested that &#8216;climategate&#8217; hadn’t had any impact on attitudes to the [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the best way to measure changes over time; we should be more confident about this comparison than the comparison we saw last month, which suggested that &#8216;climategate&#8217; hadn’t had any impact on attitudes to the [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best of the web 10/01/09 &#8211; 16/01/09 &#124; www.the-vibe.co.uk</title>
		<link>http://www.noiseofthecrowd.com/climate-opinion-after-uea/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Best of the web 10/01/09 &#8211; 16/01/09 &#124; www.the-vibe.co.uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 14:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.climatesock.com/?p=95#comment-16</guid>
		<description>[...] Climate opinion after UEA [...] </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Climate opinion after UEA [...] </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
